Gavin [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: ð Original date posted:2012-11-26 ð Original message:Supporting DNSSEC/DANE in ...
ð
Original date posted:2012-11-26
ð Original message:Supporting DNSSEC/DANE in the future when they are widely deployed is a great idea.
Note that the x509chain field is 'repeated', and any repeated field may have zero entries. So I would suggest supporting other PKI systems in the future by adding optional new fields (for maximum compatibility or security merchants might want to include both a x509chain AND
--
Gavin Andresen
ð Original message:Supporting DNSSEC/DANE in the future when they are widely deployed is a great idea.
Note that the x509chain field is 'repeated', and any repeated field may have zero entries. So I would suggest supporting other PKI systems in the future by adding optional new fields (for maximum compatibility or security merchants might want to include both a x509chain AND
--
Gavin Andresen