Mike Masnick on Nostr: ... if they didn't know it was libelous, they couldn't be held liable for it, under ...
... if they didn't know it was libelous, they couldn't be held liable for it, under historical 1st Amendment jurisprudence. Again, if we went back to that by getting rid of 230, you now encourage FB to never even try to find out if it's libelous, because that's when they'd be liable.
Published at
2025-03-07 04:40:09Event JSON
{
"id": "7a3b818e11e87dafa4f28554418722f65e383bbfc5bb7102cb8b4e9f5d57b9c0",
"pubkey": "b8dcb26d4b288fb83b37ea6ec5b8573af57bccd9093cab1646f148ddcd55d2e6",
"created_at": 1741322409,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://bsky.brid.gy/convert/ap/at://did:plc:cak4klqoj3bqgk5rj6b4f5do/app.bsky.feed.post/3ljr6vuvoyk2d",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "... if they didn't know it was libelous, they couldn't be held liable for it, under historical 1st Amendment jurisprudence. Again, if we went back to that by getting rid of 230, you now encourage FB to never even try to find out if it's libelous, because that's when they'd be liable.",
"sig": "58c9b47a0dc408b1aed136a20169b8d53b0b4e189894ca7ca2904cc19438af2634fcb1a3d449e138682b585bc68d9abf4f2d9b6bbf7f156db2efb11211dec632"
}