Tyler Smith on Nostr: npub1kpwlx…xxzz4 npub1wyj84…gmkhk npub1a3qw5…md4yg the title and first line ...
npub1kpwlxpzkxfmuxjmzc2wp3rf9vjg0sgydmlhsnrgqr3maf59h86qqdxxzz4 (npub1kpw…xzz4) npub1wyj84xdj2zxgxrcmaw8u7h2c3ws577737g7edt0d5vmsyenqdg9s2gmkhk (npub1wyj…mkhk) npub1a3qw5h3e8df78wcl34jw9edps2exma0a3ysu6d6p5e5k4ejs6krs3md4yg (npub1a3q…d4yg)
the title and first line report objective facts. The only potentially subjective claim might be describing the convoy as "far right" I guess? That doesn't seem like a stretch to me, but I suppose. From reporting further down the description of a "pedophille conspiracy" seems fair.
PressProgress have a particular perspective, and they aren't shy about it. It's arguably better to be up front about that than claiming to be a completely disinterested neutral observer. Certainly better than an article in the Globe and Mail that might "objectively" omit a labour viewpoint altogether.
the title and first line report objective facts. The only potentially subjective claim might be describing the convoy as "far right" I guess? That doesn't seem like a stretch to me, but I suppose. From reporting further down the description of a "pedophille conspiracy" seems fair.
PressProgress have a particular perspective, and they aren't shy about it. It's arguably better to be up front about that than claiming to be a completely disinterested neutral observer. Certainly better than an article in the Globe and Mail that might "objectively" omit a labour viewpoint altogether.