Chris Liss on Nostr: follower count = proof of stake. quality posts = proof of work Granted, many large ...
follower count = proof of stake.
quality posts = proof of work
Granted, many large follower, low-post accounts have substantial proof of work *outside* of nostr.
If you want to grow nostr, build a client that rewards *nostr* proof of work.
Suggestion in the post below:
quality posts = proof of work
Granted, many large follower, low-post accounts have substantial proof of work *outside* of nostr.
If you want to grow nostr, build a client that rewards *nostr* proof of work.
Suggestion in the post below:
quoting note1kkk…dy9gJust gonna repeat this until someone with the skills does it:
Build into a client the ability to follow a list of the most prolific 10K, 5K, or 2K posters (figure out the right number) for the past day, week, month, whatever, minus the spam of course. Could even set it to eliminate 'GM” as counting toward actual posts. Even better have the abilityof the user to toggle off the avatar/name of the poster if he prefers.
Now, I’m reading only those who have PROOF OF WORK, not PROOF OF STAKE.
The result would be everyone who is doing the work would get followed with a much higher chance of their posts getting seen.
The second-order effect would be CURATION. It would be MUCH easier for someone (or a group) with the time to be on nostr constantly to highlight and re-post the 50-100 best ones every day. That curator would get a lot of followers and would be boosting quality posts.
Other curators would emerge. New npubs would get instant engagement for posting quality because they would get into the golden 2000 or 5000 or whatever.
The ecosystem would grow rapidly due to quality.
I will keep posting this until someone sees it.
note1epl…2jan