NEW1 on Nostr: To clarify to you and #[6] The question of hiring needed to be a logical answer from ...
To clarify to you and globalstatesmen (npub1yd6…flvx) The question of hiring needed to be a logical answer from me. In order to accomplish the job in the most efficient way possible I cant let an emotional reaction affect the decision because it might decrease the success rate of my task.
I come into a moral dilemma with letting my emotions interfere. I have no doubt you’d kill someone causing harm to your children. I wouldn’t blame you for it.
But it wasn’t a question of who lives or dies. Because if that was the case in my experience Ive never met a human being that deserves the life it has. Myself included. From this perspective no one would ever be allowed to live based on any transgression towards its own species. I don’t feel this species deserves to continue its survival at this time.
That doesn’t mean I have to be part of the problem. I try my best to look past peoples faults and see them for the good they provide.
I also cant judge someone for who they were. I need to judge them for who they are now. This means regardless of what anyone has have done in the past. If I start putting up parameters this would include what they might do in the future. This leads to no person is of any value in my view. Its tough to live like this and I seek to change my view but I haven’t met anyone that has given me hope yet.
I cant care about what other peoples opinion is on the matter. Being told how to act and what I should think or feel is what got me here in the first place. The damage here was done by me not being true to myself. In an effort to improve myself I have to accept people aren’t perfect. I need to look for ways to help them. Not just kill every person that I feel deserves it.
Im not trying to argue or tell you your opinion isn’t warranted. Im saying it’s not a disgusting answer because from me it was the best answer I could provide. The alternative emotional answer is worse for everyone.
You don’t have to agree but I hope you understand now.
I still look for a better future.
I come into a moral dilemma with letting my emotions interfere. I have no doubt you’d kill someone causing harm to your children. I wouldn’t blame you for it.
But it wasn’t a question of who lives or dies. Because if that was the case in my experience Ive never met a human being that deserves the life it has. Myself included. From this perspective no one would ever be allowed to live based on any transgression towards its own species. I don’t feel this species deserves to continue its survival at this time.
That doesn’t mean I have to be part of the problem. I try my best to look past peoples faults and see them for the good they provide.
I also cant judge someone for who they were. I need to judge them for who they are now. This means regardless of what anyone has have done in the past. If I start putting up parameters this would include what they might do in the future. This leads to no person is of any value in my view. Its tough to live like this and I seek to change my view but I haven’t met anyone that has given me hope yet.
I cant care about what other peoples opinion is on the matter. Being told how to act and what I should think or feel is what got me here in the first place. The damage here was done by me not being true to myself. In an effort to improve myself I have to accept people aren’t perfect. I need to look for ways to help them. Not just kill every person that I feel deserves it.
Im not trying to argue or tell you your opinion isn’t warranted. Im saying it’s not a disgusting answer because from me it was the best answer I could provide. The alternative emotional answer is worse for everyone.
You don’t have to agree but I hope you understand now.
I still look for a better future.