Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2013-09-25 📝 Original message:We could also say that if ...
📅 Original date posted:2013-09-25
📝 Original message:We could also say that if protocol part (https://) is missing, it's implied
automatically. So just:
bitcoin:1abc........?r=bob.com/r/aZgR
I think that's about as small as possible without re-using the pubkey as a
token in the url.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Mike Hearn <mike at plan99.net> wrote:
>
>> BTW, on the "make qrcodes more scannable" front -- is it too late to
>> change BIP 72 so the new param is just "r" instead of "request"? Every byte
>> helps when it comes to qrcodes ...
>>
>
> Not too late, assuming there are no objections. Smaller QR codes is a very
> good reason to change it.
>
> --
> --
> Gavin Andresen
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130925/342acca1/attachment.html>
📝 Original message:We could also say that if protocol part (https://) is missing, it's implied
automatically. So just:
bitcoin:1abc........?r=bob.com/r/aZgR
I think that's about as small as possible without re-using the pubkey as a
token in the url.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Mike Hearn <mike at plan99.net> wrote:
>
>> BTW, on the "make qrcodes more scannable" front -- is it too late to
>> change BIP 72 so the new param is just "r" instead of "request"? Every byte
>> helps when it comes to qrcodes ...
>>
>
> Not too late, assuming there are no objections. Smaller QR codes is a very
> good reason to change it.
>
> --
> --
> Gavin Andresen
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130925/342acca1/attachment.html>