Nicholas Conrad on Nostr: gut Section 230 strip protection from civil liability from Internet platforms that ...
gut Section 230 strip protection from civil liability from Internet platforms that don't meet arbitrary Government "standards of neutrality, transparency, fairness, and non-discrimination"?
This is literally what section 230 said anyway. To get 230 protection you need to be a neutral "content platform", and explicitly not make 'editorial' content decisions. There is a carve-out for illegal, graphic and "otherwise objectionable" content and rn the publishers in platforms' clothing just drive dumbstrucks full of editorial content moderation decisions through the "otherwise objectionable" loophole.
Published at
2024-11-09 17:08:28Event JSON
{
"id": "a1512c46de5e0a94721db40f5f915ceeccd4d81d113c669b82c30675b936c4be",
"pubkey": "02d2dfc6aec8929712fa1486437bd521bc3ed7a1d9fde04b50d203b15f5d6775",
"created_at": 1731172108,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"b808d50107cd2557ceab1235027bdbc35049c64cef8c2f3ba1d9ef3d45c603c2",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"92f6465911642b1a0e2792a9fabc000ed5b128e6b83a72d3fd98504b265fa2da",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://aklp.club/objects/c8a456d6-829c-4a91-b279-dfdce6680438",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "\n\ngut Section 230 strip protection from civil liability from Internet platforms that don't meet arbitrary Government \"standards of neutrality, transparency, fairness, and non-discrimination\"?\n\nThis is literally what section 230 said anyway. To get 230 protection you need to be a neutral \"content platform\", and explicitly not make 'editorial' content decisions. There is a carve-out for illegal, graphic and \"otherwise objectionable\" content and rn the publishers in platforms' clothing just drive dumbstrucks full of editorial content moderation decisions through the \"otherwise objectionable\" loophole.",
"sig": "bea96813a5e95885701cc7e5810b60ed5a6291cf7f0cced17cb6a68a37a89576ebe02ba72d606e573a3f9f4cadff31e5a235bdd23cdef9882a225f46e4240509"
}
