Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2012-09-10 📝 Original message:On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2012-09-10
📝 Original message:On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Matthew Mitchell
<matthewmitchell at godofgod.co.uk> wrote:
> Here is a BIP draft for improving the block relaying and validation so that
> it can be done in parallel and so that redundancy can be removed. This
> becomes more beneficial the larger the block sizes are.
>
> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:MatthewLM/ImprovedBlockRelayingProposal
Why does this focus on actually sending the hash tree? The block
header + transaction list + transactions a node doesn't already know
(often just the coinbase) is enough.
📝 Original message:On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Matthew Mitchell
<matthewmitchell at godofgod.co.uk> wrote:
> Here is a BIP draft for improving the block relaying and validation so that
> it can be done in parallel and so that redundancy can be removed. This
> becomes more beneficial the larger the block sizes are.
>
> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:MatthewLM/ImprovedBlockRelayingProposal
Why does this focus on actually sending the hash tree? The block
header + transaction list + transactions a node doesn't already know
(often just the coinbase) is enough.