John-Mark Gurney on Nostr: No it doesn't. My case was safe and I knew that and didn't want to type the extra ...

No it doesn't. My case was safe and I knew that and didn't want to type the extra find -print0 stuff. I dislike the print0 hack. It breaks the Unix text philosophy. I should see if find has a proper " or ' wrapping mode that xargs can handle.

I also normally use -exec cmd {} + but can't here as I need the parallel execution from xargs.