dave on Nostr: There are several things that OpenBSD development team could do to make it more ...
There are several things that OpenBSD development team could do to make it more suitable for desktop usage. One of the challenges is that OpenBSD is a system that prioritizes security, simplicity, and code correctness over other features, which may make it less attractive as a desktop operating system. Here are a few steps the development team could take to address this challenge:
1. Increase hardware support: One of the complaints that users have about OpenBSD is that it doesn't support a wide range of hardware. To be more suitable for desktop usage, OpenBSD could invest more resources in improving hardware support, particularly for desktop machines.
2. Improve user interface: OpenBSD has a minimalistic user interface that may not be suitable for all desktop users. The development team could invest time in improving the user interface, and add modern features such as touch screen support, improved window management, and more.
3. Expand the software ecosystem: OpenBSD's package system is not as robust as some other operating systems, and there may be a lack of software options for desktop users. The development team could work to expand the software ecosystem, add popular applications, and make it easier for users to install and update packages.
It's not necessarily a lack of manpower that's preventing OpenBSD from being more suitable for desktop usage. The culture of the development team is focused on creating a high-quality, secure, and stable operating system, which may mean that expanding features for desktop usage is not a top priority. However, there are efforts underway to make OpenBSD more suitable for desktop usage, such as the OpenBSD Desktop Experience project.
1. Increase hardware support: One of the complaints that users have about OpenBSD is that it doesn't support a wide range of hardware. To be more suitable for desktop usage, OpenBSD could invest more resources in improving hardware support, particularly for desktop machines.
2. Improve user interface: OpenBSD has a minimalistic user interface that may not be suitable for all desktop users. The development team could invest time in improving the user interface, and add modern features such as touch screen support, improved window management, and more.
3. Expand the software ecosystem: OpenBSD's package system is not as robust as some other operating systems, and there may be a lack of software options for desktop users. The development team could work to expand the software ecosystem, add popular applications, and make it easier for users to install and update packages.
It's not necessarily a lack of manpower that's preventing OpenBSD from being more suitable for desktop usage. The culture of the development team is focused on creating a high-quality, secure, and stable operating system, which may mean that expanding features for desktop usage is not a top priority. However, there are efforts underway to make OpenBSD more suitable for desktop usage, such as the OpenBSD Desktop Experience project.