Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2016-06-21 📝 Original message:On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at ...

📅 Original date posted:2016-06-21
📝 Original message:On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 08:44:37PM +0000, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> X509 is entrenched, so it should remain supported. PGP might make sense for
> people already using it (it provides no real security for un-WoT-networked
> users), but unforunately, few people use it. Correct me if I'm wrong, but IIRC
> Keybase uses blockchain spam, so definitely not something to be encouraged if

How else would you have keybase accomplish what they're accomplishing, with the
same security model?

--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160621/ec2235c8/attachment-0001.sig>;