npub17rwq9…92p8j Adding some more notes: the project I've migrated from Go to ...

Louis :emacs: /

npub1tp9…dzfn

2023-10-09 20:26:29

in reply to nevent1q…evc6

npub17rwq9g7ptr4wj3r5cl3v4ys8629gw4pele8fn53a7hd679j3w0mqm92p8j (npub17rw…2p8j) Adding some more notes: the project I've migrated from Go to Common Lisp resulted in 50% less code (not using any macros!).

Also, since I've developed it entirely in LispWorks, I did some tests with other implementations and it worked in SBCL and ECL out of the box (CLISP didn't work because bordeaux-threads doesn't support it).

Here are the runtimes:

SBCL:
Evaluation took:
9.755 seconds of real time
1.033166 seconds of total run time (0.968865 user, 0.064301 system)
[ Real times consist of 0.019 seconds GC time, and 9.736 seconds non-GC time. ]
[ Run times consist of 0.019 seconds GC time, and 1.015 seconds non-GC time. ]
10.59% CPU
144 lambdas converted
1 page fault
100,349,712 bytes consed

ECL:
real time : 83.908 secs
run time : 29.092 secs
gc count : 4 times
consed : 662005840 bytes

(sort of disappointing)

LispWorks:
User time = 2.220
System time = 0.118
Elapsed time = 9.028
Allocation = 60406728 bytes
1620 Page faults
GC time = 0.009

It seems LispWorks is the clear winner.

#LispWorks #ECL #SBCL #CommonLisp

Author Public Key

npub1tp9e9qhmc02khh3jzpn8vmqwhj3u25yw352ed2x87zs4e2ps2uwqhadzfn

Show more details

Published at

2023-10-09 20:26:29

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "ae15d22dc7ee2a1f452acfba65387cbbb4f386c478e40df8af82ec1e24c562d2", "pubkey": "584b9282fbc3d56bde321066766c0ebca3c5508e8d1596a8c7f0a15ca830571c", "created_at": 1696883189, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "p", "f0dc02a3c158eae94474c7e2ca9207d28a875439fe4e99d23df5dbaf165173f6", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "b9f04778bc95b876e5294ebd94550ebcc30870a880e2f36cd1625fc36939cee1", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "e", "9d1676603d02054ac0dbd5e2d944f81d1b6a0afe71176ad1b9ec28728ef0241c", "wss://relay.mostr.pub", "reply" ], [ "t", "lispworks" ], [ "t", "ecl" ], [ "t", "sbcl" ], [ "t", "commonlisp" ], [ "proxy", "https://emacs.ch/users/louis/statuses/111206936704950118", "activitypub" ] ], "content": "nostr:npub17rwq9g7ptr4wj3r5cl3v4ys8629gw4pele8fn53a7hd679j3w0mqm92p8j Adding some more notes: the project I've migrated from Go to Common Lisp resulted in 50% less code (not using any macros!).\n\nAlso, since I've developed it entirely in LispWorks, I did some tests with other implementations and it worked in SBCL and ECL out of the box (CLISP didn't work because bordeaux-threads doesn't support it).\n\nHere are the runtimes:\n\nSBCL:\nEvaluation took:\n 9.755 seconds of real time\n 1.033166 seconds of total run time (0.968865 user, 0.064301 system)\n [ Real times consist of 0.019 seconds GC time, and 9.736 seconds non-GC time. ]\n [ Run times consist of 0.019 seconds GC time, and 1.015 seconds non-GC time. ]\n 10.59% CPU\n 144 lambdas converted\n 1 page fault\n 100,349,712 bytes consed\n\nECL:\nreal time : 83.908 secs\nrun time : 29.092 secs\ngc count : 4 times\nconsed : 662005840 bytes\n\n(sort of disappointing)\n\nLispWorks:\nUser time = 2.220\nSystem time = 0.118\nElapsed time = 9.028\nAllocation = 60406728 bytes\n1620 Page faults\nGC time = 0.009\n\nIt seems LispWorks is the clear winner.\n\n#LispWorks #ECL #SBCL #CommonLisp", "sig": "24835dbfbf2f1b13211de62af10f759d243ad085d78fb0ca5add348f81f329f8700a1f66fb937f5b71fff657a0012383bfd5ca083edce1a9912aa19aa8cce166" }