Luke Dashjr [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-12-30 📝 Original message:On Wednesday, December 30, ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-12-30
📝 Original message:On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 4:35:17 PM Tomas via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> In an attempt to reduce developer centralization, and to reduce the risk
> of forks introduced by implementation other than bitcoin-core, I have
> drafted a BIP to support changes to the protocol from different
> implementations.
The premises in Motivation are false. BIPs are required to have a reference
implementation, but that implementation need not necessarily be for Bitcoin
Core specifically.
The specification itself looks like an inefficient and bloaty reinvention of
version bits.
Luke
📝 Original message:On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 4:35:17 PM Tomas via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> In an attempt to reduce developer centralization, and to reduce the risk
> of forks introduced by implementation other than bitcoin-core, I have
> drafted a BIP to support changes to the protocol from different
> implementations.
The premises in Motivation are false. BIPs are required to have a reference
implementation, but that implementation need not necessarily be for Bitcoin
Core specifically.
The specification itself looks like an inefficient and bloaty reinvention of
version bits.
Luke