matt on Nostr: Sure, this wasn’t intended to describe new protocols, and indeed there are *many* ...
Sure, this wasn’t intended to describe new protocols, and indeed there are *many* more spectrums on which protocols should be evaluated. I specifically, however, am somewhat annoyed at protocols trying to call themselves “non-custodial” when they require trusting some operator in some way in order for you to be sure you can get your money back.
Published at
2025-02-26 12:13:39Event JSON
{
"id": "a854bd8fa237ca366e206651b933f8b62703365116094574b491e4e58e6fc2f6",
"pubkey": "3d2e51508699f98f0f2bdbe7a45b673c687fe6420f466dc296d90b908d51d594",
"created_at": 1740572019,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"200bad0f4629889b61663d3d64bb561188315dd476c3408a78db79fca4eb2dff",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"40dba84f5da3afea42b1c79c4ca08f355b212bfa79e2f3b5971d977560498750",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f1725586a402c06aec818d1478a45aaa0dc16c7a9c4869d97c350336d16f8e43"
]
],
"content": "Sure, this wasn’t intended to describe new protocols, and indeed there are *many* more spectrums on which protocols should be evaluated. I specifically, however, am somewhat annoyed at protocols trying to call themselves “non-custodial” when they require trusting some operator in some way in order for you to be sure you can get your money back.",
"sig": "12621117f3999531e438fda59a89f5df4e892271222ccba36c8dafa021fc7615627c18cb0487c32fac053d26d6ff5a40f62fea0d563a41c73bda2bd5f21adf84"
}
