silverpill on Nostr: Iceshrimp.NET has a section titled "FEPs we intend to support in the future" in their ...
Iceshrimp.NET has a section titled "FEPs we intend to support in the future" in their FEDERATION.md:
https://iceshrimp.dev/iceshrimp/Iceshrimp.NET/src/branch/dev/FEDERATION.md#feps-we-intend-to-support-in-the-future
Streams: "Fediverse FEPs we will not ever support"
https://codeberg.org/streams/streams/src/branch/release/FEDERATION.md#fediverse-feps-we-will-not-ever-support
NodeBB has a similar page in their documentation where position towards various FEPs is indicated using words "positive", "neutral", "defer", and "negative":
https://docs.nodebb.org/activitypub/fep/
I think this is a good practice.
https://iceshrimp.dev/iceshrimp/Iceshrimp.NET/src/branch/dev/FEDERATION.md#feps-we-intend-to-support-in-the-future
Streams: "Fediverse FEPs we will not ever support"
https://codeberg.org/streams/streams/src/branch/release/FEDERATION.md#fediverse-feps-we-will-not-ever-support
NodeBB has a similar page in their documentation where position towards various FEPs is indicated using words "positive", "neutral", "defer", and "negative":
https://docs.nodebb.org/activitypub/fep/
I think this is a good practice.