johnhaar on Nostr: Someone should create an AI experience that shows: — Politicians making statements ...
Someone should create an AI experience that shows:
— Politicians making statements that were actually made by different politicians on the other end of the political spectrum... for example Trump saying something that Kamala actually said
— The AI experience would would also include statements that actually were made by the politician shown saying it
— It would be structured in a quiz format
— At the start of the quiz, you say which politician you support more
— At the end of each video statement, you have to say whether you agree or disagree with the statement/policy
— Higher scores if you agree with the statements that were actually made by the candidate you claim to support
— Lower score if say you agree with a statement which was actually made by the politician that you claim to be against, or disagree with a statement made by the politician you claim to support
— The statements should pertain to major tangible policy items... can't be feel-good euphemisms... and can't be one-off small topics that someone could disagree with but still be a supporter of that politician
— Politicians making statements that were actually made by different politicians on the other end of the political spectrum... for example Trump saying something that Kamala actually said
— The AI experience would would also include statements that actually were made by the politician shown saying it
— It would be structured in a quiz format
— At the start of the quiz, you say which politician you support more
— At the end of each video statement, you have to say whether you agree or disagree with the statement/policy
— Higher scores if you agree with the statements that were actually made by the candidate you claim to support
— Lower score if say you agree with a statement which was actually made by the politician that you claim to be against, or disagree with a statement made by the politician you claim to support
— The statements should pertain to major tangible policy items... can't be feel-good euphemisms... and can't be one-off small topics that someone could disagree with but still be a supporter of that politician