✝️Shalltear🦇Stan💒 on Nostr: I want to tear my hair out every single time one of you fags goes along with the kike ...
I want to tear my hair out every single time one of you fags goes along with the kike language filter. A single person is not a "they". It's grammatically improper first off, second it makes you sound like a fag, and third it's the justification for crossdressing faggotry
You know when you are addressing an active position that 90% of the time it is a man, it is far more proper and correct to assume using "he" for an unidentified individual. We have done this since the written word was a thing and oral tradition and languages were passed down. We say "mankind", and "men" in reference to the whole of humanity and this was not considered errant until recently and I mean the last 5 years
I can make biblical arguments about Eve being created from Adam by God and that man was the initial representative of all mankind(literally why we use that term) as it is imperative that you do not use the language of a "reasoned" age to the best of your ability. Obviously don't play semantics with me, the way we communicate is so compromised that if we were to retvrn to a traditional standard it'd likely be impossible to effectively communicate rendering it a pointless effort. You know I mean not to adopt the terminology of the degenerate heart as to speak in abominable terms
Don't say "they", that is a nebulous term for an unknown group and quite literally that is all
Same goes for "community". I hate that word and never want to see it or hear it again. We went from identifying groups by using specific terms so that there could be no ambiguity as to who you are referring to, to this really gay qualifier + the satanic pedophile meaningless term "community". I like Ilya from Princess Connect, she calls Yuuki her 'minion', so if I made a forum dedicated to her we'd call ourselves 'boomer vampire minions' or something catchier but some reddit fag would say "the Ilya Ornstein community", but if there are other forums made about her then the separation has to be made by adding ANOTHER qualifier and this goes on and on because the term is entirely useless. Or if some gay youtuber also has a discord and a twitter, then when referring to the actions of the subscribers but not that of the discord becomes confusing because "youtuber's community" does not tell you the necessary information
You know when you are addressing an active position that 90% of the time it is a man, it is far more proper and correct to assume using "he" for an unidentified individual. We have done this since the written word was a thing and oral tradition and languages were passed down. We say "mankind", and "men" in reference to the whole of humanity and this was not considered errant until recently and I mean the last 5 years
I can make biblical arguments about Eve being created from Adam by God and that man was the initial representative of all mankind(literally why we use that term) as it is imperative that you do not use the language of a "reasoned" age to the best of your ability. Obviously don't play semantics with me, the way we communicate is so compromised that if we were to retvrn to a traditional standard it'd likely be impossible to effectively communicate rendering it a pointless effort. You know I mean not to adopt the terminology of the degenerate heart as to speak in abominable terms
Don't say "they", that is a nebulous term for an unknown group and quite literally that is all
Same goes for "community". I hate that word and never want to see it or hear it again. We went from identifying groups by using specific terms so that there could be no ambiguity as to who you are referring to, to this really gay qualifier + the satanic pedophile meaningless term "community". I like Ilya from Princess Connect, she calls Yuuki her 'minion', so if I made a forum dedicated to her we'd call ourselves 'boomer vampire minions' or something catchier but some reddit fag would say "the Ilya Ornstein community", but if there are other forums made about her then the separation has to be made by adding ANOTHER qualifier and this goes on and on because the term is entirely useless. Or if some gay youtuber also has a discord and a twitter, then when referring to the actions of the subscribers but not that of the discord becomes confusing because "youtuber's community" does not tell you the necessary information