waxwing on Nostr: Reading today's paper (diario El Salvador, which is a pro-government paper, though I ...
Reading today's paper (diario El Salvador, which is a pro-government paper, though I doubt that's relevant here), I found an interesting article covering a recent census monitoring remittances into the country. They say that in 2024 26.8% of households receive remittances. And that it's a 8% or so increase since 2007 (it would be weird if that was the last time they had such a survey, but, not sure). Unsurprisingly the US is the source of more than 90%. And near the end they quote the statistic of 1% through "crypto wallets", even less than the only 4% through cash (presumably meaning the personal physically brings it). What isn't entirely clear is whether a transfer via the Chivo "cajeras" (ATMs) in the country, which I have heard is a popular method for some in the US, because they can send to a Chivo wallet or even use a Chivo ATM in ES embassies apparently (some complex little details there, that were explained to me, but I forget), would be counted under "billeteras digitales de criptomonedas" or not, or perhaps even as "efectivo" since that's what you'd receive from the ATM. Tbh 1% sounds kinda low, especially when you consider that "empresas de remesadoras" (which is western union and the like) charge significantly higher fees, and apparently account for 57%.
Here should be a digital link to what I just read:
https://diarioelsalvador.com/el-26-8-de-los-hogares-salvadorenos-reciben-remesas-segun-censo-2024/619840/#elsalvador
Published at
2025-02-04 22:35:46Event JSON
{
"id": "a09cdb22b6e6f8476ae44dd0e7dab7745f9a1710fb84581e3a1c9dc7af55337f",
"pubkey": "675b84fe75e216ab947c7438ee519ca7775376ddf05dadfba6278bd012e1d728",
"created_at": 1738708546,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"elsalvador"
],
[
"r",
"https://diarioelsalvador.com/el-26-8-de-los-hogares-salvadorenos-reciben-remesas-segun-censo-2024/619840/"
]
],
"content": "Reading today's paper (diario El Salvador, which is a pro-government paper, though I doubt that's relevant here), I found an interesting article covering a recent census monitoring remittances into the country. They say that in 2024 26.8% of households receive remittances. And that it's a 8% or so increase since 2007 (it would be weird if that was the last time they had such a survey, but, not sure). Unsurprisingly the US is the source of more than 90%. And near the end they quote the statistic of 1% through \"crypto wallets\", even less than the only 4% through cash (presumably meaning the personal physically brings it). What isn't entirely clear is whether a transfer via the Chivo \"cajeras\" (ATMs) in the country, which I have heard is a popular method for some in the US, because they can send to a Chivo wallet or even use a Chivo ATM in ES embassies apparently (some complex little details there, that were explained to me, but I forget), would be counted under \"billeteras digitales de criptomonedas\" or not, or perhaps even as \"efectivo\" since that's what you'd receive from the ATM. Tbh 1% sounds kinda low, especially when you consider that \"empresas de remesadoras\" (which is western union and the like) charge significantly higher fees, and apparently account for 57%.\n\nHere should be a digital link to what I just read: https://diarioelsalvador.com/el-26-8-de-los-hogares-salvadorenos-reciben-remesas-segun-censo-2024/619840/\n\n#elsalvador",
"sig": "eecfb4e5230e87068c7a2174366a2c18568879d6e0b45907ef2bb4ec128b6077b635686ab059f4d7c6f964f8452f0750672b3b7a26e264ebf96d573940153b2c"
}