Event JSON
{
"id": "a0c796ed68cd1d5b2cf054dbdc09ee78051802ef9f31871342496408dbe5e9e3",
"pubkey": "286fee5b55279c7031bb63cad7b07350f0f827103b452a37cf1364d32af8f941",
"created_at": 1704816212,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"e7f76f0d1fdf887c12cbf5eaf15dd3bb0b88f806051739f63200aae91a8a734e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"9eefd04d32ab5da8de12d7b83201578ea095a676acf3a692ec1b0b202ae4e16f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"00260397d056f41c51d4cb9c9d9586ed02e0607842929f54134f69a684bfdbcc",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/NIH_LLAMAS/statuses/111726835312455750",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1ulmk7rglm7y8cykt7h40zhwnhv9c37qxq5tnna3jqz4wjx52wd8q2whweg So many of these seem like people can't comprehend that the design patent holder was not the inventor of the world's first shoe/basket/table/etc. It's not as surprising when average people see utility patents and make that mistake without reading the text, but it's really weird for judges to (apparently) make the same error on designs.",
"sig": "bc8748d027c980f35c6c28075ee754c66ff810212e6cb1c1e68286545a75d77328df84d272b85f90f3e5b3b476d0dd886d3a9eb3d4bac66a539bbc43a6611db4"
}
