jerrud on Nostr: I like Sartre for phenomenological ontology. He writes with more style. From what I ...
I like Sartre for phenomenological ontology. He writes with more style. From what I understand it’s basically all cribbed from Husserl, but Being and Nothingness by Sartre is my jam.
If I want density without style I’ll just read Kant.
Published at
2024-09-27 03:42:33Event JSON
{
"id": "ab5cdb7456dfa16f1eb9a7343deb2f993f356e10650a72217b188950b4edb25c",
"pubkey": "3436c6f3e5c10513a959fc7ed7bcfbdf3241788cfa517f892650f4829fe226a4",
"created_at": 1727408553,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"0e1f485a9b15ec706a17eb94c41f86e722f97046960108fc94f0dbbf1e4c70db",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"bd9eb657c25b4f6cda68871ce26259d1f9bc62420487e3224905b674a710a45a"
]
],
"content": "I like Sartre for phenomenological ontology. He writes with more style. From what I understand it’s basically all cribbed from Husserl, but Being and Nothingness by Sartre is my jam. \nIf I want density without style I’ll just read Kant.",
"sig": "ebb5ddae316a0e64eb49ebd913911b375185a6dbeef70847fbd0d9cfad82f3b3b2d9204ed726abb63f32beabcc879d6857026b29628fdc614a29cd6554918755"
}
