Levka on Nostr: (1.) To condemn its violation *is* to defend sovereignty. The specific violation he ...
(1.) To condemn its violation *is* to defend sovereignty. The specific violation he condemns is the crossing of a border which no real anarchist recognizes. Real anarchists don't recognize the legitimacy of *any* border.
One cannot "reject state sovereignty" and at the same time condemn it violation. The concepts contradict.
(2.) Why should I be polite to someone who insults me? He compared me to tankies. That's an serious insult. Tankies murdered anarchists wholesale and stacked our bodies in pits. They're evil. Comparing me to tankies is tantamount to calling me evil. It's insulting. People who insult me don't deserve my treating them politely. That's one of the stupidest of all liberal ideologies.
One cannot "reject state sovereignty" and at the same time condemn it violation. The concepts contradict.
(2.) Why should I be polite to someone who insults me? He compared me to tankies. That's an serious insult. Tankies murdered anarchists wholesale and stacked our bodies in pits. They're evil. Comparing me to tankies is tantamount to calling me evil. It's insulting. People who insult me don't deserve my treating them politely. That's one of the stupidest of all liberal ideologies.