Tim Kellogg on Nostr: npub1fqt7n…dvxe6 npub1u2hl9…4z4d7 You keep using that word — pseudoscience ...
npub1fqt7nf5ujj63hxjqnmgx8nw9w7te9dkxxv97mlymg0vqk06scu3smdvxe6 (npub1fqt…vxe6) npub1u2hl9r48emg8eq82nh8zwadl3xr93u7vkk37qavfcg7cu3dmrrzqe4z4d7 (npub1u2h…z4d7) You keep using that word — pseudoscience
that's typically reserved for fields of study that aren't provable. e.g. string theory is considered pseudoscience because it can't be disproven, so experimentation isn't feasible. Note that it's been heavily peer reviewed.
being wrong isn't pseudoscience, it's just bad research, but fully in the realm of science. we follow lots of dead-ends for a lot of reasons
that's typically reserved for fields of study that aren't provable. e.g. string theory is considered pseudoscience because it can't be disproven, so experimentation isn't feasible. Note that it's been heavily peer reviewed.
being wrong isn't pseudoscience, it's just bad research, but fully in the realm of science. we follow lots of dead-ends for a lot of reasons