Fox [Art-Lu K.M.] on Nostr: npub1cr302…0u26c Right, because you can't be arsed to really parse what I'm saying. ...
npub1cr3026z7x2gdf5lmlnx97f539umpwqgnuu5zjwqlf05vnym3jk6sl0u26c (npub1cr3…u26c)
Right, because you can't be arsed to really parse what I'm saying.
NYT and Wikipedia articles are less likely to be quoted verbatim because the same information is scattered about.
Cause statistics and probability. But to flat out state something is not possible is utterly ignorant.
If you have something unique, and it gets dumped into an LLM it can repeat it, doesn't matter what it is. If it's repetitive garbage, then you get the same garbage.
Same with stable diffusion...
Right, because you can't be arsed to really parse what I'm saying.
NYT and Wikipedia articles are less likely to be quoted verbatim because the same information is scattered about.
Cause statistics and probability. But to flat out state something is not possible is utterly ignorant.
If you have something unique, and it gets dumped into an LLM it can repeat it, doesn't matter what it is. If it's repetitive garbage, then you get the same garbage.
Same with stable diffusion...