Sarah Burstein on Nostr: Once a TRO is granted in a #ScheduleA case, the deck is totally stacked against the ...
Once a TRO is granted in a #ScheduleA case, the deck is totally stacked against the defendants. Their money is frozen. The plaintiffs are generally asking for a settlement that would cost far less than fighting back.
You just can't assume that a lack of appearance/objection is any kind of admission of wrongdoing.
Published at
2023-12-01 12:38:16Event JSON
{
"id": "abd7da3f57e474878c4f29ee7455513360ff027bae86b3aebc9853231c6a534b",
"pubkey": "9eefd04d32ab5da8de12d7b83201578ea095a676acf3a692ec1b0b202ae4e16f",
"created_at": 1701434296,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d3357a2834a9cc5075c1f346ff67b31030e8da1f44f517f9adedce08d664e775",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"t",
"schedulea"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/design_law/statuses/111505198077432609",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Once a TRO is granted in a #ScheduleA case, the deck is totally stacked against the defendants. Their money is frozen. The plaintiffs are generally asking for a settlement that would cost far less than fighting back.\n\nYou just can't assume that a lack of appearance/objection is any kind of admission of wrongdoing.",
"sig": "b14370c981374bd1dcfd53892be408b56a4a5b915b8f3d1397628206e7f2f42efb3b5b6b4b74c539a9ab592c1c212cc72f9b7f4ec6c5f443afdb6c87b64030da"
}
