Dissident Sound on Nostr: i disagree about too much work part. gene editing tech is already advanced today - it ...
i disagree about too much work part. gene editing tech is already advanced today - it is just illegal to use on humans.
low-IQ racists want to select people purely on the basis of eye color arguing that this is the best measure of racial "purity"
that it may be ... but it is not a measure of the value of the genes
i am not racist - i am EUGENICIST
the high-IQ thing to do would be to select people who are excellent at various things and then in the future use gene editing to combine only the best parts of different genomes to create people to precise specifications
we already use gene editing to create different kinds of lawn grasses for different parts of the golf course ( as well as for different climates, of course ) so why not use gene editing to create different people for different parts of the planet. we could create a dark skin race for hot climates while simultaneously giving them intelligence of whites and work ethic of the Japanese for example.
low-IQ racists want to select people purely on the basis of eye color arguing that this is the best measure of racial "purity"
that it may be ... but it is not a measure of the value of the genes
i am not racist - i am EUGENICIST
the high-IQ thing to do would be to select people who are excellent at various things and then in the future use gene editing to combine only the best parts of different genomes to create people to precise specifications
we already use gene editing to create different kinds of lawn grasses for different parts of the golf course ( as well as for different climates, of course ) so why not use gene editing to create different people for different parts of the planet. we could create a dark skin race for hot climates while simultaneously giving them intelligence of whites and work ethic of the Japanese for example.