TK on Nostr: Yeah, this isn't the issue. (It's not a coincidence that your wife says the same ...
Yeah, this isn't the issue. (It's not a coincidence that your wife says the same thing most women do btw)
The issue is that "Love Languages" are about emotions and get trotted out primarily as post hoc rationalizations for a woman being dissatisfied with her man. A woman can just move the goalposts AND when a guy says his love language is physcial touch, lambast him for being shallow. Guys who fall into the trap of thinking this can EVER solve the core issue are "beta cuck simps." Hence the OP.
The issue is that "Love Languages" are about emotions and get trotted out primarily as post hoc rationalizations for a woman being dissatisfied with her man. A woman can just move the goalposts AND when a guy says his love language is physcial touch, lambast him for being shallow. Guys who fall into the trap of thinking this can EVER solve the core issue are "beta cuck simps." Hence the OP.