Jorge Timón [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2016-11-16 📝 Original message:On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2016-11-16
📝 Original message:On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Thomas Kerin via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> BIP30 actually was given similar treatment after a reasonable amount of time
> had passed.
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L2392
This is not really the same. BIP30 is not validated after BIP34 is
active because blocks complying with BIP34 will always necessarily
comply with BIP30 (ie coinbases cannot be duplicated after they
include the block height).
📝 Original message:On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Thomas Kerin via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> BIP30 actually was given similar treatment after a reasonable amount of time
> had passed.
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L2392
This is not really the same. BIP30 is not validated after BIP34 is
active because blocks complying with BIP34 will always necessarily
comply with BIP30 (ie coinbases cannot be duplicated after they
include the block height).