📅 Original date posted:2013-10-19 📝 Original message:On 2013-10-19, at 4:20 PM, ...

Jean-Paul Kogelman [ARCHIVE] /

npub1sa8…y304

2023-06-07 15:07:35

in reply to nevent1q…v6x6

📅 Original date posted:2013-10-19
📝 Original message:On 2013-10-19, at 4:20 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Luke-Jr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
>> See BIP 1 for the process.. proposals go to this mailing list first.
>
> FWIW, he did post to the mailing list and he got an underwhelming response:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=20ec1e35-3051-45d6-b449-e4a4d5c06dc8%40me.com&forum_name=bitcoin-development

Although I agree that the number of responses on the mailing list was minimal, they were overall positive. Mike voiced concerns about not having a date field to limit the rescan when importing, but other than that, most of the discussion was on bitcointalk. I've made a number of revisions, trying to incorporate the suggestions that were given. Obviously this doesn't mean that the draft is final (specifically the KDF's that can be used is still up for debate and having 29 undefined ID's means it's reasonably future proof).

Having it on the BIP page doesn't make it any more official, I agree, but it does increase its exposure and will hopefully spark some more discussion.

jp
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131019/995fc3a3/attachment.sig>;

Author Public Key

npub1sa86gng3pvs3jgyt5majwcrhn8ck5qxgy9pjqxkh79u638cd7dys28y304

Show more details

Published at

2023-06-07 15:07:35

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "a4dde88f66c25f8c46b76ec613f80279af8801a2ce6a1685b593346e3c102b6b", "pubkey": "874fa44d110b2119208ba6fb27607799f16a00c82143201ad7f179a89f0df349", "created_at": 1686150455, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "d7c1869dab2bd34b6e5ae79cda5d73bda811a1af3e65276521fa77a929d2819d", "", "root" ], [ "e", "0f134cf6ce1ffcb7ef833e9630fb35b5a16011f31ccf5959d9717d56b4214a54", "", "reply" ], [ "p", "4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73" ] ], "content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-10-19\n📝 Original message:On 2013-10-19, at 4:20 PM, Gregory Maxwell \u003cgmaxwell at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Luke-Jr \u003cluke at dashjr.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e See BIP 1 for the process.. proposals go to this mailing list first.\n\u003e \n\u003e FWIW, he did post to the mailing list and he got an underwhelming response:\n\u003e \n\u003e http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=20ec1e35-3051-45d6-b449-e4a4d5c06dc8%40me.com\u0026forum_name=bitcoin-development\n\nAlthough I agree that the number of responses on the mailing list was minimal, they were overall positive. Mike voiced concerns about not having a date field to limit the rescan when importing, but other than that, most of the discussion was on bitcointalk. I've made a number of revisions, trying to incorporate the suggestions that were given. Obviously this doesn't mean that the draft is final (specifically the KDF's that can be used is still up for debate and having 29 undefined ID's means it's reasonably future proof).\n\nHaving it on the BIP page doesn't make it any more official, I agree, but it does increase its exposure and will hopefully spark some more discussion.\n\n\njp\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 842 bytes\nDesc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131019/995fc3a3/attachment.sig\u003e", "sig": "3667e374791e2222f5372fd2d52e25575ba8eb43ac1c06b076faefe3fed773597fe45fc5cbcb53b9ac1bf375c9d6f8d5e42b2af7521756b884efeadec7d9c1a1" }