James Edwards on Nostr: Given that "*" for a required field constitutes an unarticulated annotation, seems ...
Given that "*" for a required field constitutes an unarticulated annotation, seems like we should be using `<u>` for it.
Yeah I know it doesn't expose any semantics (nor would it negate the need for `aria-required` even if it did), but we have to use something, and this fits.
#html #form #validation
Published at
2024-06-26 10:50:24Event JSON
{
"id": "a6991c2dc2df1ffda1565d3a9482c892db4a247e8fb09251dcbbee978a704636",
"pubkey": "5d78a900466c87ad276db31284220f3ac3611f9d40d4e0f9adabe87673b35e0a",
"created_at": 1719399024,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"html"
],
[
"t",
"form"
],
[
"t",
"validation"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.world/users/siblingpastry/statuses/112682534490919873",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Given that \"*\" for a required field constitutes an unarticulated annotation, seems like we should be using `\u003cu\u003e` for it.\n\nYeah I know it doesn't expose any semantics (nor would it negate the need for `aria-required` even if it did), but we have to use something, and this fits.\n\n#html #form #validation",
"sig": "8ffd60fe373a9adde2e2f23aaea2a0b24adb83c4616678e9f7bf223150abb0fdc27fd984b50c95cef1db8a48f3107eb3b88e39ef0dc568a713ddfcd115c3e62b"
}
