naama.kates at gmail.com [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-10-06 📝 Original message:Hi Byron, I've been using ...

📅 Original date posted:2015-10-06
📝 Original message:Hi Byron,

I've been using shadow a bit-- I think these simulators are important for testing, but Shadow, at least, certainly seems to have limitations, in some crucial respects. Running shadow w Tor (which is only logical, because many BCT transactions transpire over Tor) is not as 'light' as presented and slows my own box down quite a bit, so the stats can't possibly be accurate... I don't know if this answers any questions or if you've had this experience at all -- perhaps it is negligible on a more powerful machine than my own-- or perhaps there is an adjustment still unaccounted?

Regards,
Nina K

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 4, 2015, at 2:04 PM, Byron Gibson via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all, is anyone using simulators like Shadow (https://shadow.github.io), BTCSim (https://github.com/btcsuite/btcsim), etc. to test proposed changes to Bitcoin? I have a few questions about their capabilities and limitations.
>
> Byron Gibson
> http://mirror.co/
> https://keybase.io/byrongibson
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151006/0526cce0/attachment.html>;