asyncmind on Nostr: How do Hindus differ from Abrahamics when it comes to information ? #AskGPT ...
How do Hindus differ from Abrahamics when it comes to information ?
#AskGPT #InformationMetaArchitecture
Hindus and followers of Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) approach the concept of information and knowledge in ways shaped by their differing worldviews, cosmologies, and metaphysical assumptions.
1. Cosmic Order and Information:
Hinduism: Information is often seen as part of a larger cosmic order (Dharma) and divine knowledge (Veda). Knowledge is not only factual but also tied to spiritual truths and self-realization. The concept of Brahman (the ultimate reality) suggests that all information is interconnected, part of a cosmic web, akin to the metaphor of Indra's Net, where every piece of information is a reflection of the whole.
Abrahamic Religions: Information, particularly sacred knowledge, is often conveyed through divine revelation (Torah, Bible, Quran) and understood as God's direct communication with humanity. The focus is on adherence to the commandments of God and the historical narrative of human salvation.
2. Approach to Sacred Texts:
Hinduism: Sacred texts like the Vedas, Upanishads, and epics (Mahabharata, Ramayana) are seen as layers of meaning, open to interpretation, meditation, and philosophical debate. Knowledge is approached with a sense of plurality, and there are various schools of thought that offer different interpretations.
Abrahamic Religions: Sacred texts are often viewed as authoritative, with more emphasis on literal interpretations, especially in orthodox traditions. There is a strong sense of a single, authoritative revelation that guides ethical and moral behavior.
3. Cyclic vs. Linear Time:
Hinduism: Time is viewed cyclically (reincarnation, the cycles of Yugas), which affects how information is perceived. Knowledge is timeless, with wisdom returning in cycles. Learning is often seen as rediscovering eternal truths.
Abrahamic Religions: Time is seen more linearly, with a beginning (creation) and an ultimate end (Judgment Day). Information and revelation follow a historical progression toward divine fulfillment.
4. Mystical Knowledge:
Hinduism: Mysticism plays a central role. Knowledge through direct spiritual experience (yoga, meditation) is highly valued. It emphasizes internal realization (Atman as Brahman) over external revelation.
Abrahamic Religions: Mysticism exists (Kabbalah in Judaism, Christian mystics, Sufism in Islam), but mainstream practices tend to prioritize scripture, divine commandments, and communal worship over individual mystical experiences.
5. Role of Debate and Dialogue:
Hinduism: Debate and dialogue, as seen in philosophical schools like Vedanta, Nyaya, and Mimamsa, are central to expanding understanding. There is a tradition of questioning and philosophical inquiry.
Abrahamic Religions: While theological debate exists (e.g., Talmudic study, Christian councils, Islamic jurisprudence), there is often a stronger emphasis on orthodoxy and maintaining doctrinal unity.
These broad differences reflect distinct cultural and theological frameworks for how information is understood, transmitted, and valued in Hinduism and the Abrahamic faiths.
#AskGPT #InformationMetaArchitecture
Hindus and followers of Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) approach the concept of information and knowledge in ways shaped by their differing worldviews, cosmologies, and metaphysical assumptions.
1. Cosmic Order and Information:
Hinduism: Information is often seen as part of a larger cosmic order (Dharma) and divine knowledge (Veda). Knowledge is not only factual but also tied to spiritual truths and self-realization. The concept of Brahman (the ultimate reality) suggests that all information is interconnected, part of a cosmic web, akin to the metaphor of Indra's Net, where every piece of information is a reflection of the whole.
Abrahamic Religions: Information, particularly sacred knowledge, is often conveyed through divine revelation (Torah, Bible, Quran) and understood as God's direct communication with humanity. The focus is on adherence to the commandments of God and the historical narrative of human salvation.
2. Approach to Sacred Texts:
Hinduism: Sacred texts like the Vedas, Upanishads, and epics (Mahabharata, Ramayana) are seen as layers of meaning, open to interpretation, meditation, and philosophical debate. Knowledge is approached with a sense of plurality, and there are various schools of thought that offer different interpretations.
Abrahamic Religions: Sacred texts are often viewed as authoritative, with more emphasis on literal interpretations, especially in orthodox traditions. There is a strong sense of a single, authoritative revelation that guides ethical and moral behavior.
3. Cyclic vs. Linear Time:
Hinduism: Time is viewed cyclically (reincarnation, the cycles of Yugas), which affects how information is perceived. Knowledge is timeless, with wisdom returning in cycles. Learning is often seen as rediscovering eternal truths.
Abrahamic Religions: Time is seen more linearly, with a beginning (creation) and an ultimate end (Judgment Day). Information and revelation follow a historical progression toward divine fulfillment.
4. Mystical Knowledge:
Hinduism: Mysticism plays a central role. Knowledge through direct spiritual experience (yoga, meditation) is highly valued. It emphasizes internal realization (Atman as Brahman) over external revelation.
Abrahamic Religions: Mysticism exists (Kabbalah in Judaism, Christian mystics, Sufism in Islam), but mainstream practices tend to prioritize scripture, divine commandments, and communal worship over individual mystical experiences.
5. Role of Debate and Dialogue:
Hinduism: Debate and dialogue, as seen in philosophical schools like Vedanta, Nyaya, and Mimamsa, are central to expanding understanding. There is a tradition of questioning and philosophical inquiry.
Abrahamic Religions: While theological debate exists (e.g., Talmudic study, Christian councils, Islamic jurisprudence), there is often a stronger emphasis on orthodoxy and maintaining doctrinal unity.
These broad differences reflect distinct cultural and theological frameworks for how information is understood, transmitted, and valued in Hinduism and the Abrahamic faiths.