Tier Nolan [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2016-03-07 š Original message:These are the relevant ...
š
Original date posted:2016-03-07
š Original message:These are the relevant info BIPs.
NODE_GETUTXO
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0064.mediawiki
NODE_BLOOM:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0111.mediawiki
The relevant code is here:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/protocol.h#L228
The NODE_GETUTXO bit was included even though it is not supported by core.
(It is one of XT's features).
I think you need to be able to reasonably claim that the bit is useful and
will have actual users, before you can claim a bit.
You can also claim one of the free for all bits 24 - 31, but that is
supposed to be only temporary.
Giving a link to "thin blocks" would help promote discussion about its
merits.
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 8:06 PM, G. Andrew Stone via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> The Bitcoin Unlimited client needs a services bit to indicate that the
> node is capable of communicating thin blocks. We propose to use bit 4 as
> AFAIK bit 3 is already earmarked for Segregated Witness.
>
> Andrew
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160307/48ace09c/attachment-0001.html>
š Original message:These are the relevant info BIPs.
NODE_GETUTXO
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0064.mediawiki
NODE_BLOOM:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0111.mediawiki
The relevant code is here:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/protocol.h#L228
The NODE_GETUTXO bit was included even though it is not supported by core.
(It is one of XT's features).
I think you need to be able to reasonably claim that the bit is useful and
will have actual users, before you can claim a bit.
You can also claim one of the free for all bits 24 - 31, but that is
supposed to be only temporary.
Giving a link to "thin blocks" would help promote discussion about its
merits.
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 8:06 PM, G. Andrew Stone via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> The Bitcoin Unlimited client needs a services bit to indicate that the
> node is capable of communicating thin blocks. We propose to use bit 4 as
> AFAIK bit 3 is already earmarked for Segregated Witness.
>
> Andrew
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160307/48ace09c/attachment-0001.html>