leftout on Nostr: >But you should, like, know what the science actually says, because it’s different ...

>But you should, like, know what the science actually says, because it’s different from what the activists say the science says.

So you would retract that statement which states activists says something different from science and does not qualify with *sometimes*.

For the record, I always trace down the original source of statements about science and read those. Far too often both left and right cherry pick and get it wrong. Is this on purpose? It's definitely lazy. They see what they want and grab that bit and run with it. I'd like to think the two of us will be better than that.