Nic ⚡ on Nostr: I’m curious about your perspective here. Why would a 120-year chart be more ...
I’m curious about your perspective here. Why would a 120-year chart be more meaningful than a 500-million-year one if the concern is about current CO2 levels being unusually high? Wouldn’t a broader timeline give a more comprehensive view?
Given that Earth has experienced extreme conditions—like being a fiery ball of magma at one point and a frozen ice ball at another—what do you think would qualify as a "normal" average temperature for our planet?
Published at
2024-11-01 21:43:09Event JSON
{
"id": "a3eb11acc5fc9b7e84a77adffcd56f82974b484c9ec163521b2960184b600f0a",
"pubkey": "8d78f3903a1b708c77696e07d2f49065e792b830825679af650313c2d3233370",
"created_at": 1730497389,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c90889eed2b618e4471d56fcad6850822126a6a8fd703f940d933d33d00f098b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"10a223b07a672b7d0a998a7537a9093d1432daa50daffce99207d5dcb65de39c"
],
[
"e",
"a7ddfaedfe0baeed9d8fd170a5fb77e891f70c86190be2c3278c4ecf71f212ad",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"c582af78dff442700ec59e21786532a7074c00be8b7b1eac989bbf62698069cc"
],
[
"p",
"90eb20364eea23c320b750476b36772b5348bf2960d0d6ba941239a576ca3150"
],
[
"p",
"7bdef7be22dd8e59f4600e044aa53a1cf975a9dc7d27df5833bc77db784a5805"
]
],
"content": "I’m curious about your perspective here. Why would a 120-year chart be more meaningful than a 500-million-year one if the concern is about current CO2 levels being unusually high? Wouldn’t a broader timeline give a more comprehensive view?\n\nGiven that Earth has experienced extreme conditions—like being a fiery ball of magma at one point and a frozen ice ball at another—what do you think would qualify as a \"normal\" average temperature for our planet?",
"sig": "928456ff90d47193d87672fd1dadbeea5590823c933909457245f71e0c23fcfdd59dd5e7e1fb7a16273160eebfe4ff1077bd802ad1718c36af3a10eedd4eed2a"
}
