Eric Lombrozo [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-08-24 📝 Original message:Indeed, so I don't really ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-08-24
📝 Original message:Indeed, so I don't really have a problem with this proposal.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 11:30 AM Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 06:15:39PM +0000, Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
> > It would be very useful to not only be able to switch filtering on and
> off
> > globally...but to be able to switch on a per-connection basis. But then
>
> You don't necessarily need to send everyone the same nServices bits.
> E.g. you could give whitelisted peers special privileges.
>
> But only advertize the intersection of your supported services (eg those
> you offer to the general public) in `addr` messages.
>
> Wladimir
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150824/bcf59418/attachment.html>;
📝 Original message:Indeed, so I don't really have a problem with this proposal.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 11:30 AM Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 06:15:39PM +0000, Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
> > It would be very useful to not only be able to switch filtering on and
> off
> > globally...but to be able to switch on a per-connection basis. But then
>
> You don't necessarily need to send everyone the same nServices bits.
> E.g. you could give whitelisted peers special privileges.
>
> But only advertize the intersection of your supported services (eg those
> you offer to the general public) in `addr` messages.
>
> Wladimir
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150824/bcf59418/attachment.html>;