Event JSON
{
"id": "aaf6c45e1474cb12ac74fe55e2e3ea246892d39490b0adf2409ff423a4b4b48a",
"pubkey": "f4cc82a4af3715257846fc953efad23b7ffd5ff7edc1352de768139f7871b2db",
"created_at": 1692555025,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"4ebb1885240ebc43fff7e4ff71a4f4a1b75f4e296809b61932f10de3e34c026b",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"8b0be93ed69c30e9a68159fd384fd8308ce4bbf16c39e840e0803dcb6c08720e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"7ec0d993b122aaf0251adaa1fdd6f6fcb4ced42bcdbe11a46945b0f3068fdbd7",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/scrwd/statuses/110923286144020781",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1f6a33pfyp67y8llhunlhrf855xm47n3fdqymvxfj7yx78c6vqf4scxpnql is GPT-4 significantly better for coding than 3.5? I confess to have used it myself when I'm stuck or want a different angle - certainly easier than trawling stackoverflow - but usually I find enough flaws that I end up sinking hours into the problems. I wonder if the problem is the 2019 data (new lobs and frameworks have moved on) or whether it is something more fundamental.",
"sig": "1d0818263db91ea1294fa4f2a1dd2ea0b4cd9ce8c06d5a4a33901a39b938507a7b0a0db82ee5434fa076744c8b4fa2af9ba151ca1a8227e8a2917699955e4eff"
}