Event JSON
{
"id": "a894512626c770c1424f3c3b9772e2b8f56dd8d401ee74ea2a29fd2c135aef17",
"pubkey": "0ecc4e999a6ece69b4a5c1de90118b96e1b0e8e863d5a5b489810557bdeb5d9f",
"created_at": 1730015412,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"f4e14b153884668c1c2e80405d92db80b8c912cb6db8f487cb0aff23c755becb",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"19ec5589808fc0da994ab0fdf3d962c3729c7db76e47503980688359d183bd40",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"b6e1e4ece51a52b845c30fa47b86c7b56a538dcd8f8cf1566d17a2c6e12abc4e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://neuromatch.social/users/neuralreckoning/statuses/113378290045814473",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub17ns5k9fcs3ngc8pwspq9mykmszuvjyktdku0fp7tptlj8364hm9s7fh6qj excellent point about the lower range of paper and the digital focus on resolution! I wonder did film (as in cinema) use more dynamic range? Or maybe not because it would have been hard for them in the early days to produce lamps bright enough to make it actually higher dynamic range?",
"sig": "2e883de450a99ae6683138fbbc2e0f1f5a42d925d2cdb2583f132092f07b0aa2ee59115a5f0ae460caea34d203b4ff52b82e7ab5331683f8b1b0bc889072ec17"
}
