Tamas Blummer [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-11-07 📝 Original message:Peter, forking would work ...
📅 Original date posted:2014-11-07
📝 Original message:Peter,
forking would work best with a freeze of the consensus code. Do you see any chance for that?
Tamas Blummer
On Nov 7, 2014, at 1:03 AM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> Forking the codebase, rather than rewriting it, best
> ensures that your code actually implements the protocol properly, is
> safe to use for mining, and actually gets used.
>
> Rewriting Bitcoin Core is a fun project, but it's terrible politics.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20141107/3ea9f778/attachment.sig>;
📝 Original message:Peter,
forking would work best with a freeze of the consensus code. Do you see any chance for that?
Tamas Blummer
On Nov 7, 2014, at 1:03 AM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> Forking the codebase, rather than rewriting it, best
> ensures that your code actually implements the protocol properly, is
> safe to use for mining, and actually gets used.
>
> Rewriting Bitcoin Core is a fun project, but it's terrible politics.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20141107/3ea9f778/attachment.sig>;