Jeff Garzik [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2013-12-02 š Original message:On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at ...
š
Original date posted:2013-12-02
š Original message:On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Mike Hearn <mike at plan99.net> wrote:
> "The payment protocol at least would need some notion of fee, or possibly
> (better?) the ability for a recipient to specify some inputs as well as some
> outputs."
<vendor hat: on>
BitPay noticed this detail last week. We were noticing that some
transactions were not even reaching our bitcoind border routers (edge
nodes), due to low/no fees. That led to a long discussion of all
things fee-related. SPV fees are a big issue. Getting
child-pays-for-parent in some form out to miners is another. Getting
a smart, dynamic fee market Gavin mentions is a big need.
--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
š Original message:On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Mike Hearn <mike at plan99.net> wrote:
> "The payment protocol at least would need some notion of fee, or possibly
> (better?) the ability for a recipient to specify some inputs as well as some
> outputs."
<vendor hat: on>
BitPay noticed this detail last week. We were noticing that some
transactions were not even reaching our bitcoind border routers (edge
nodes), due to low/no fees. That led to a long discussion of all
things fee-related. SPV fees are a big issue. Getting
child-pays-for-parent in some form out to miners is another. Getting
a smart, dynamic fee market Gavin mentions is a big need.
--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/