unnamed on Nostr: Yes, it would be good at least for transparency and statistics, to serve as basis of ...
Yes, it would be good at least for transparency and statistics, to serve as basis of claims saying that the shadowban doesn't happen a lot.
But please, don't frame everything as censorship or shadowban. Sometimes the intention is to filter spam.
If we start labelling everything so heavy, words will loose it's meanings
Published at
2023-06-10 21:09:57Event JSON
{
"id": "f21a1b258b8082b6b82d44dda78bb3cbd8902f3dcff79c5e32b28288f53add5d",
"pubkey": "f80da646c394faf16a80ce8007514cbe51f40175304ffe726fd67707ca8006b3",
"created_at": 1686431397,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"4084bb4c405ca69aeb9cc40870ece429649d56ff14813ec17daf41bab44f3126"
],
[
"p",
"5be6446aa8a31c11b3b453bf8dafc9b346ff328d1fa11a0fa02a1e6461f6a9b1"
]
],
"content": "Yes, it would be good at least for transparency and statistics, to serve as basis of claims saying that the shadowban doesn't happen a lot.\n\nBut please, don't frame everything as censorship or shadowban. Sometimes the intention is to filter spam.\n\nIf we start labelling everything so heavy, words will loose it's meanings ",
"sig": "3fa8c29b7f625ce4d4f265abc3c3ddd7b8df3ff552998588f1d440789bf3c07a7c0cb33faa8757ed6c50de8e188d2cbad0be3dba69e8ae03cac548b26c15f815"
}
