Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2013-12-04 📝 Original message:On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at ...

📅 Original date posted:2013-12-04
📝 Original message:On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:

> replace-by-fee is no less speculative than your original proposals;
> you're also trying to convince people that things should work
> differently re: fees


The original proposal I started this thread with hasn't even received
comments - presumably it's uncontroversial. The other discussions are about
how to handle fees in requests that use the payment protocol, which isn't
currently used anywhere so doing things differently isn't possible.

On the other hand you have been talking about a fundamental change to the
behaviour of how all Bitcoin nodes operate, which is off topic for this
thread.

If you have something specific to say about how floating fees should be
managed by SPV wallets or how fees should be negotiated when the payment
protocol is in use, this thread is appropriate. Otherwise please take it
elsewhere.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131204/c10ebe19/attachment.html>;