Mark Friedenbach [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2014-05-03 š Original message:I don't think such a pull ...
š
Original date posted:2014-05-03
š Original message:I don't think such a pull request would be accepted. The point was to
minimize impact to the block chain. Each extras txout adds 9 bytes
minimum, with zero benefit over serializing the data together in a
single OP_RETURN.
On 05/03/2014 11:39 AM, Peter Todd wrote:
> The standard format ended up being exactly:
>
> OP_RETURN <0 to 40-byte PUSHDATA>
>
> You've split the data across two PUSHDATA's. The standard should have let the data be split up like that; pull requests accepted.
>
š Original message:I don't think such a pull request would be accepted. The point was to
minimize impact to the block chain. Each extras txout adds 9 bytes
minimum, with zero benefit over serializing the data together in a
single OP_RETURN.
On 05/03/2014 11:39 AM, Peter Todd wrote:
> The standard format ended up being exactly:
>
> OP_RETURN <0 to 40-byte PUSHDATA>
>
> You've split the data across two PUSHDATA's. The standard should have let the data be split up like that; pull requests accepted.
>