Event JSON
{
"id": "f34017a1841fb8ccc72af63176369d70a4bb531a24fd56504c82c12b2fee72ce",
"pubkey": "b4d36d71b4ec0c2e7af0d1a4751455a4d9c0e21e54636af237f1139cea353eb8",
"created_at": 1703393199,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"ac2338946a6f03c7b083e62a7b046912d3fcf376da145dbe75f1c804565cc8ec",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"e78d730a6d4de3f0674813838f1bc1d808298edb09fa93414e8d7e92545a1a8a",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"8cde06a8ef14891624991b0f42b627209e90403c1b611230725807fa86a703e2",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://lingo.lol/users/JeroenSH/statuses/111633576747280121",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub14s3n39r2dupu0vyruc48kprfztfleumkmg29m0n478yqg4juerkq56hnzd What about the fact that the Impeachment clause says \"the party *convicted*\" is subject to further prosecution? Doesn't that suggest that if he's not convicted, he's not subject to further prosecution? They make this point again and again. How to refute this?",
"sig": "a5950850cfb5c28a847571e46cb20b3e9336fabac72a006880218c25479fcd0bbfc5d0b4008fdf3fafbd5a5ecf316e029b30db35184844c890ef34401f1bce2c"
}
