Rusty Russell [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-07-27 📝 Original message: Joseph Poon <joseph at ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-07-27
📝 Original message:
Joseph Poon <joseph at lightning.network> writes:
> OP_CSV still requires BIP 62, though. It's possible to construct a model
> with OP_CLTV without BIP 62 (described in a post earlier today) using
> single-funder with some OP_CLTV'd output which returns the full balance
> to the original funder at a date very far in the future after the
> expiration of all Commitments and its dependent outputs.
Yeah, I'm happy at this stage assuming BIP62. There don't seem any
objections to it, just not huge motivation.
Nice to know we have a backup if that proves overly optimistic :)
Cheers,
Rusty.
📝 Original message:
Joseph Poon <joseph at lightning.network> writes:
> OP_CSV still requires BIP 62, though. It's possible to construct a model
> with OP_CLTV without BIP 62 (described in a post earlier today) using
> single-funder with some OP_CLTV'd output which returns the full balance
> to the original funder at a date very far in the future after the
> expiration of all Commitments and its dependent outputs.
Yeah, I'm happy at this stage assuming BIP62. There don't seem any
objections to it, just not huge motivation.
Nice to know we have a backup if that proves overly optimistic :)
Cheers,
Rusty.