ava on Nostr: Even if that were true, it still proves my point. Not all Jews are Zionists, and not ...
Even if that were true, it still proves my point. Not all Jews are Zionists, and not all Jews, American or Israeli "support the genocide of Palestinians."
In addition to stating that 95% static you provided, you also stated that Jews living in the US who are supporters of AIPAC and other Jewish lobbies get lumped into that 95% category you claim to be accurate.
The reality is far more nuanced than that. It would also be difficult to get accurate statistics from inside Israel since the population is more subject to government control and coercion.
In addition, saying the phrase, "support the genocide of Palestinians" is a strong way to try to make your point by painting with a very broad brush stroke, but it's not an accurate statement.
According to (pewresearch.org), a much more credible source than TikTok:
"An overwhelming majority of Jewish American adults (93%) say that the way Hamas carried out its Oct. 7 attack was unacceptable.
But Jewish adults under 35 are divided over Israel’s military response: 52% say the way Israel has carried out the war has been acceptable, while 42% call it unacceptable, and 6% are unsure. Jews ages 50 and older are far more likely to say Israel’s conduct of the war has been acceptable (68%)."
"Four-in-ten American Jews have a favorable view of the Palestinian people – somewhat lower than the 50% of Americans overall who say the same. Very few Jewish Americans have a favorable opinion of Hamas, which has controlled Gaza, or the Palestinian Authority, which controls the West Bank (3% and 12%, respectively)."
"When it comes to how U.S. President Joe Biden is handling the conflict, relatively few Jewish adults under 50 (35%) say he is striking the right balance between Israelis and Palestinians. By comparison, 53% of Jews ages 50 and older say Biden is striking the right balance."
"An overwhelming majority of Jewish Americans (94%) say there is at least some discrimination against Jews in America, including 72% who say there is a lot. Among Americans overall, a large majority (82%) also perceive at least some discrimination against American Jews."
Read more here:
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/04/02/how-us-jews-are-experiencing-the-israel-hamas-war/
Now, it's also very important to note that one major thing people learn when they take Statics in University is how unreliable and easy to manipulate or misrepresent they can be.
While I don't disagree that statistics are a powerful tool for understanding trends and making decisions, they must be interpreted with a critical eye, considering the underlying factors that can influence their accuracy and reliability.
Here's another statistic:
On Aug. 19, 1934, the German public voted 90 percent in favor of Chancellor Adolf Hitler becoming Führer und Reichskanzler (“leader and chancellor”), a new title created after the death of President Paul von Hindenburg earlier in the month.
Does that make all Germans evil too?
As I stated above, statistics can be manipulated or misrepresented, which is why it's crucial to understand the context, methodology, and sources behind any statistical data.
Here are some key points to consider:
Context and Definitions: The definition of what constitutes "support" can vary widely. For example, electoral support may not fully capture the extent of ideological support or complicity in a regime's policies.
Methodology: The way data is collected, such as the sample size, sampling method, and questions asked, can significantly influence results.
For instance, the 1934 plebiscite where 90% of voters approved Hitler's new role was conducted in a highly controlled and coercive environment.
Source Reliability: The credibility of the source is critical. Reputable sources like historical analyses, academic research, and well-documented articles provide more reliable information compared to anecdotal or opinion-based sources.
So, I will say it again: When one paints with dangerously broad brush strokes, stereotyping and attempting to condemn a group of human beings—an ethnic group—based on the actions or inactions of a government, religion, or for any other reason, that is egregious bigotry.
I have nothing more to say on the topic.
In addition to stating that 95% static you provided, you also stated that Jews living in the US who are supporters of AIPAC and other Jewish lobbies get lumped into that 95% category you claim to be accurate.
The reality is far more nuanced than that. It would also be difficult to get accurate statistics from inside Israel since the population is more subject to government control and coercion.
In addition, saying the phrase, "support the genocide of Palestinians" is a strong way to try to make your point by painting with a very broad brush stroke, but it's not an accurate statement.
According to (pewresearch.org), a much more credible source than TikTok:
"An overwhelming majority of Jewish American adults (93%) say that the way Hamas carried out its Oct. 7 attack was unacceptable.
But Jewish adults under 35 are divided over Israel’s military response: 52% say the way Israel has carried out the war has been acceptable, while 42% call it unacceptable, and 6% are unsure. Jews ages 50 and older are far more likely to say Israel’s conduct of the war has been acceptable (68%)."
"Four-in-ten American Jews have a favorable view of the Palestinian people – somewhat lower than the 50% of Americans overall who say the same. Very few Jewish Americans have a favorable opinion of Hamas, which has controlled Gaza, or the Palestinian Authority, which controls the West Bank (3% and 12%, respectively)."
"When it comes to how U.S. President Joe Biden is handling the conflict, relatively few Jewish adults under 50 (35%) say he is striking the right balance between Israelis and Palestinians. By comparison, 53% of Jews ages 50 and older say Biden is striking the right balance."
"An overwhelming majority of Jewish Americans (94%) say there is at least some discrimination against Jews in America, including 72% who say there is a lot. Among Americans overall, a large majority (82%) also perceive at least some discrimination against American Jews."
Read more here:
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/04/02/how-us-jews-are-experiencing-the-israel-hamas-war/
Now, it's also very important to note that one major thing people learn when they take Statics in University is how unreliable and easy to manipulate or misrepresent they can be.
While I don't disagree that statistics are a powerful tool for understanding trends and making decisions, they must be interpreted with a critical eye, considering the underlying factors that can influence their accuracy and reliability.
Here's another statistic:
On Aug. 19, 1934, the German public voted 90 percent in favor of Chancellor Adolf Hitler becoming Führer und Reichskanzler (“leader and chancellor”), a new title created after the death of President Paul von Hindenburg earlier in the month.
Does that make all Germans evil too?
As I stated above, statistics can be manipulated or misrepresented, which is why it's crucial to understand the context, methodology, and sources behind any statistical data.
Here are some key points to consider:
Context and Definitions: The definition of what constitutes "support" can vary widely. For example, electoral support may not fully capture the extent of ideological support or complicity in a regime's policies.
Methodology: The way data is collected, such as the sample size, sampling method, and questions asked, can significantly influence results.
For instance, the 1934 plebiscite where 90% of voters approved Hitler's new role was conducted in a highly controlled and coercive environment.
Source Reliability: The credibility of the source is critical. Reputable sources like historical analyses, academic research, and well-documented articles provide more reliable information compared to anecdotal or opinion-based sources.
So, I will say it again: When one paints with dangerously broad brush strokes, stereotyping and attempting to condemn a group of human beings—an ethnic group—based on the actions or inactions of a government, religion, or for any other reason, that is egregious bigotry.
I have nothing more to say on the topic.