WLKNSN on Nostr: I wouldn’t be too smug about bankruns. Bitcoin has value because people believe it ...
I wouldn’t be too smug about bankruns. Bitcoin has value because people believe it does. That numbers in UTXOs are widely agreed to have real monetary value is a remarkably unlikely bit of coordinated textual interpretation, which is a lot more contingent and fragile than bitcoiners let on. I think much of the discomfort around ordinals, for example, comes from the fact that it highlights just how much the meaning of anything within the system is a matter of convention. The durability of the convention that the symbols stored in the big bitcoin database represent money and not, say, a codex of mystic numerology is only minimally a matter of math or consensus mechanisms. It’s mostly a matter of the durability of the belief system that constitute BTC as a synthetic commodity money, which is at least as brittle and prone to sudden collapse as shared belief in the safety of deposits in a conventional bank. Bitcoin isn’t subject to fractional reserve bankruns, but it is subject to a loss of faith, or drift in the worldview that constitutes it.
Published at
2023-03-12 00:24:48Event JSON
{
"id": "f873ec521ecf4674aed72784f11964f03e7f3a5516349145c42ce8f392ebaadf",
"pubkey": "94e19ed8532ac7bb6ea2d268795819544c35aba232c4018745d9272d23e614ae",
"created_at": 1678580688,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "I wouldn’t be too smug about bankruns. Bitcoin has value because people believe it does. That numbers in UTXOs are widely agreed to have real monetary value is a remarkably unlikely bit of coordinated textual interpretation, which is a lot more contingent and fragile than bitcoiners let on. I think much of the discomfort around ordinals, for example, comes from the fact that it highlights just how much the meaning of anything within the system is a matter of convention. The durability of the convention that the symbols stored in the big bitcoin database represent money and not, say, a codex of mystic numerology is only minimally a matter of math or consensus mechanisms. It’s mostly a matter of the durability of the belief system that constitute BTC as a synthetic commodity money, which is at least as brittle and prone to sudden collapse as shared belief in the safety of deposits in a conventional bank. Bitcoin isn’t subject to fractional reserve bankruns, but it is subject to a loss of faith, or drift in the worldview that constitutes it.",
"sig": "04f24a50ed7242264747542a1c9bb467eb16caf4d1c17a09f7da7a09fa944fc9aa8347ae7d5e8f8b0d4dcee84d49308feee594274410c331e412f851236052a4"
}