Event JSON
{
"id": "f81c847d751ad7697fe97c8f4d76f51ea62decb1ece6ca4405a0bd3ae1badc04",
"pubkey": "aab80b08bdc410629c29103d0ea8cb7b8ae4324e8c47cd6023df82b724f823ab",
"created_at": 1723218680,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"bd7855d440c04ee8a2c91112e1ec06cdc723bfc885ed695880a48b3983a0782c",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"da365790bf863f88c720a28f5eb64636df6ab45e905e2f63a5147c7e1c278493",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"c837267327484d6e0eab0a10da8c4b93235b7069158128b05d49ca5a41dc57a6",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://rheinneckar.social/users/niklaskorz/statuses/112932859463596123",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1h4u9t4zqcp8w3gkfzyfwrmqxehrj807gshkkjkyq5j9nnqaq0qkqmccnpk Warum pnpm? Denos eigenes Paketcaching nutzt doch auch schon Content Addressed Storage, sollte also genauso effizient wie pnpm sein",
"sig": "91e0d54edc65dbcaee78ecd77f9eb91e835c2a67e0c56fe471830d27c2b8a8ca0e6983692fd627889f93f13616b24de72249d2b004741dedb152509bebb3eb4a"
}
