Bryan Bishop [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-12-08 📝 Original message:On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-12-08
📝 Original message:On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Akiva Lichtner via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> and miners would have to round-robin through partitions
At first glance this proposal seems most similar to the sharding proposals:
http://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/scalingbitcoin/sharding-the-blockchain/
https://github.com/vbuterin/scalability_paper/blob/master/scalability.pdf
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3u1m36/why_arent_we_as_a_community_talking_about/cxbamhn
http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1168.pdf (committee approach)
> but clients would have to send more than one message in order to spend money
Offloading work to the client for spends has in the past been a
well-received concept, such as the linearized coin history idea.
- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507
📝 Original message:On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Akiva Lichtner via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> and miners would have to round-robin through partitions
At first glance this proposal seems most similar to the sharding proposals:
http://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/scalingbitcoin/sharding-the-blockchain/
https://github.com/vbuterin/scalability_paper/blob/master/scalability.pdf
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3u1m36/why_arent_we_as_a_community_talking_about/cxbamhn
http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1168.pdf (committee approach)
> but clients would have to send more than one message in order to spend money
Offloading work to the client for spends has in the past been a
well-received concept, such as the linearized coin history idea.
- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507