Event JSON
{
"id": "f1decf980b94ddfe34e09bc0d2d0af45a05b37bb888f517951c1174e0df00c6c",
"pubkey": "58ebc0624a248b6c1a1fb3ea1b1be7dac4880f28f1504a351fdf04642f061659",
"created_at": 1736929410,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"cbc2f5a24a4889587d2de68e8196669343add43cf22ad056eabacc4367ee23ed",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"25953054bfae5e9f7f39c4d2ede1897751eb30749d5ff275acb749625337a441",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"5386cce756eaba2a3225db5a393b955464a19db00f38381377aef62e7fbbefd8",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://zirk.us/users/interfluidity/statuses/113831405816760670",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqe0p0tgj2fzy4slfdu68gr9nxjdp6m4pu7g4dq4h2htxyxelwy0ksptf5zg but also, perhaps paradoxically, in some contexts the very controversy contributes to the clarity of what one is communicating. to refer, as i did, to “excess” wokeness as censorious invites the kind of controversy reflected in this exchange. i think that’s a feature, not a bug, because it communicates precisely what i am commenting on, a censoriousness both claimed and contested. 2/",
"sig": "2628ad0703fbe000ed9c0efbed2eaeedfcc764a6bdb1b5b2ef47518b07f94fa2cba149ba235aa3f3caf2799fd3865bdfbf0808217729512f709d20909cbea6e8"
}