miljan on Nostr: Thank you! We will iterate further on C. I must say I am not a huge fan of those ...
Thank you!
We will iterate further on C. I must say I am not a huge fan of those small avatars, but I see that many people like this design. Maybe dtonon (npub1000…vwqk) is onto something with his suggestion to offer standard and compact layout options:
We will iterate further on C. I must say I am not a huge fan of those small avatars, but I see that many people like this design. Maybe dtonon (npub1000…vwqk) is onto something with his suggestion to offer standard and compact layout options:
quoting note1qqq…hvudIndeed in the "current" version the line height is too tall.
I would offer a preference:
* Standard (A), but increasing the font-size ~20%
* Compact (C)
This way you also please those who want a slightly larger font.
The D is a good alternative to C but the space really saved is strongly related to the presence of images, and the left empty space is not so useful.